siuru smartire systems siemens vdo automotive corp et al

Al-Salam by Schrader Electronics Ltd., Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc. (jallen, ) (Entered: )ĭeclaration re 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment Memorandum in Support - Parts 1 and 2 Declaration of Ramsey M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 03/14/08. It is finally ORDERED that plaintiff may issue a subpoena duces tecum to Ford Motor Company. Those depositions shall take place within two (2) weeks of the date of this order, in this District, and at defendant's expense. McClelland, Spanos, Thompson, and Wacker limited to issues presented by the belatedly produced documents and any documents the Court determines not to be privileged. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff will be permitted to take depositions of Messrs. In addition, defendant shall submit an annotated privilege log and a declaration or affidavit stating the possitions of persons who sent, received, or are otherwise named in those documents. It is ORDERED that defendant shall submit to the Court, in both redacted and unredacted forms, the documents at issue for IN CAMERA review by March 17, 2008, at 5 00 pm. ORDERED that plaintiff SMARTIRE SYSTEMS, INC.'s Motion to compel is GRANTED IN PART. Signed by Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 02/12/08. The Court will then determine whether any or all of those documents is privileged. Laura Slenzak requesting analysis of the '872 patent, as well as (3) the privilege log as it relates to those two documents. Gregor Kuchler and (2) the memorandum from Dr.

It is finally ORDERED that defendant SIEMENS shall produce to the Court for in camera review no later than Febru(1) the e-mail in question from Mr. Such supplement shall state with specificity what 'reasonable precautions' and 'any action or analysis considered, requested or taken by Siemens regarding or relating to the patent-in-suit, including but not limited to, any attempt to avoid infringement or design around the '872 patent.' It is further ORDERED that SIEMENS may not introduce evidence as to or assert a 'reasonable precautions' defense based on its 2003 request for legal analysis of the '872 patent or any report produced on the basis of that request.

('SIEMENS') shall supplement its answer to plaintiff's Interrogatory No. It is further ORDERED that defendant SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORP. ORDER for reasons stated from the bench and in accord with specific rulings and instructions thereto, it is ORDERED that plaintiff SMARTIRE SYSTEMS, INC.'s Motion to Compel 63 is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART.

Siuru smartire systems siemens vdo automotive corp et al